🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a proposal increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised parents to block their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," stated one MEP supporting the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, legislation is mostly happening at the state government level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain figures to copy this path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve user protection.

While this global discussion continues, the policies of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers globally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.